Sources for CW and the FRC

This is the third post in a series about Charles Williams and the Fellowship of the Rosy Cross. You can access the others here and here.

Here are the top sources that I can recommend for learning more about A.E. Waite, the Fellowship of the Rosy Cross, and Charles Williams’ involvement in this occult group. I have not read every one of them all the way through yet, so if you would like to add a description of one, please send that to me. Also, please leave me comments with other recommendations; I will add some of them to this list if they contain enough material.

a-e-waite-magician-of-many-parts_11. Gilbert, R. A. A. E. Waite: Magician of Many Parts. Bath, UK: Crucible, 1987. This book is a disorganized, non-chronological, confusing biography of A.E. Waite (Williams’s occult mentor). But it’s the only bio of Waite I know about, and has an essential chapter on Williams and Waite.

2. Gilbert, R.A. The Golden Dawn: Twilight of the Magicians (1983), the first book with accurate details about C.W.’s FRC membership.

3. Gauntlett, Edward. “Charles Williams and Magic.” This is a startling talk that suggests great heights and depths of magical influence and material in CW’s work, and even goes so far as to hint that perhaps CW was involved in more than one magical society, perhaps even the Order of the Golden Dawn itself, and may have dealt directly and personally with W.B. Yeats. Gauntlett has done other work on this subject, and I encourage you to investigate his writings if you are interested in this subject.

4. Gauntlett, Edward, thesis on C.W. and the FRC: I am not sure if this is the same as the “scholarly study” listed in the catalog of the CW Society’s papers as “Frater Qui Sitit Veniat: Charles Williams and the Secret Tradition.”

5. Brewer, Elisabeth. “Charles Williams and Arthur Edward Waite.” Seven vol. 4 (1983). 54-67. This is an academic article published in the journal of the Marion E. Wade center. You can backorder this issue here. It is a careful study of which books by Waite CW read and where their influences can be seen.

charles-williams-alchemy-and-integration6. Ashenden, Gavin. Charles Williams: Alchemy and Integration. Kent State University Press, 2007. This book focuses on the long history of hermeticism, especially alchemy as a spiritual practice, then relates this information to Williams. It is learned and comprehensive.

7. Dunning, Stephen M. The Crisis and the Quest: A Kierkegaardian Reading of Charles Williams. Waynesboro, GA: Paternoster Press, 2000. This book quite obviously originated as a dissertation, and is sometimes a bit forced in its comparisons of Williams and Kierkegaard. However, it is an intelligent philosophical study of one of the most important themes in Williams’s writing: his use of a particular “Crisis of Schism” as a form of literary theory. Dunning’s argument turns on a Kierkegaardian distinction between religions of Transcendence (in which God is separate from His creation) and Immanence (in which God dwells in people to some extent): Christianity, so Kierkegaard believed, must be only the former; occult religions are the latter, and to the extent that Williams was an occultist, so far his beliefs were contrary to Christian truth. It has an excellent appendix on Williams and Waite.

8. Newman, Barbara. “Charles Williams and the Companions of the Co-inherence.” Spiritus: A Journal of Christian Spirituality, Volume 9, Number 1, Spring 2009, pp. 1-26. This is an academic article about the order that CW founded later in his life, pointing out its occult features.

9. Howe, Ellic. The Magicians of the Golden Dawn. RKP, London 1972.

10. Knight, Gareth. The Magical World of the Inklings. Element, Shaftesbury, 1990 (there is also a new and expanded edition published in 2010). Knight is himself an initiate in an occult society and thus writes with an insider’s insight. He has written many books on occult subjects, several related to the Inklings, so there is more to read here as well.

11. Lang-Sims, Lois. Letters to Lalage. KSUP, Kent, Ohio, 1989. These are the letters that CW wrote to a young woman during his Oxford years, along with commentary she wrote later. They contain accounts of his strange treatment of her, including apparently tantric exercises, the use of a pentagram ritual, and his subsuming of her personality into a role in his myth.

12. Ridler, Anne. Introduction to The Image of the City. OUP, London 1958. This is one of the best introductions to CW from any point of view, and includes useful discussions of his occult involvement.

13. Willard, Thomas. “Acts of the Companions: A. E. Waite’s Fellowship and the Novels of Charles Williams.” A similar topic to Ed Gauntlet’s talk, above, but with more focus on the novels’ content and less on the details of power struggles among secret societies.

14. King, Roma A. Jr. The Pattern in the Web: The Mythical Poetry of Charles Williams. Kent State University Press, 1900. This excellent poetic study has a very helpful section on Williams and the Rosy Cross.

15. David Dodd’s entry in the Dictionary of Literary Biography.

16. IMPORTANT ADDITION: Aren Roukema, “A Veil that Reveals: Charles Williams and the Fellowship of the Rosy Cross” in The Journal of Inklings Studies Vol 5, No 1, April 2015. Roukema gained access to the documents of the F.R.C. and reveals deep connections between its rituals and CW’s novels.

Advertisements

About Sørina Higgins

Sørina Higgins is a writer, English teacher, and Inklings scholar. Sørina serves as Chair of the Department of Language and Literature at Signum University and teaches English at King's College and Lehigh Carbon Community College. She has published two books of poetry, "The Significance of Swans" and "Caduceus."
This entry was posted in Bibliography, Rosicruciana and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Sources for CW and the FRC

  1. David Llewellyn Dodds says:

    For the sake of thoroughness, where a reader may not immediately cross-reference this post with others (and their comments):

    In addition to 1., R.A. Gilbert’s The Golden Dawn: Twilight of the Magicians (1983), the first book with accurate details about C.W.’s FRC membership

    In addition to 2., Ed Gaunlett’s thesis on C.W. and the FRC, which I think even used to be online (perhaps someone could encourage him to put it online, somewhere!)

    In addition to 8., there is a “New and Expanded edition (October 21, 2010)” (which I have not yet seen, myself)

    While not among the “top sources”, my contribution to the Dictionary of Literary Biography, volume 153 may have a couple useful morsels of fact (and conjecture).

    Like

    • Sørina Higgins says:

      I will go ahead and add these to the post. Many thanks!

      Like

      • David Llewellyn Dodds says:

        Thanks! I am pretty sure “Frater Qui Sitit Veniat: Charles Williams and the Secret Tradition” as listed in the Society Catalogue must be the same.

        Like

  2. Andrew Stout says:

    I’ve also found helpful Bernadette Bosky’s “Charles Williams: Occult Fantasies/Occult Fact,” in the book “Modes of the Fantastic: Selected Essays from the Twelfth International Conference on the Fantastic in the Arts” (1995).

    Like

  3. David Llewellyn Dodds says:

    The latest addition to Williams-F.R.C. resources has just appeared, and it is a huge one: Aren Roukema, ‘A Veil that Reveals: Charles Williams and the Fellowship of the Rosy Cross’ in Journal of Inklings Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1, April 2015. He has worked with the F.R.C. materials in the Ritman Library, Bibliotheca Philosophica Hermetica, in Amsterdam, and publishes numerous new details of what Williams did when throughout his membership, including some degree of detail about various rituals. He also analyzes, to a certain extent, F.R.C. continuities from and similarities to the Golden Dawn. (He further looks at examples from Williams’s novels against the details of his F.R.C. experience.)

    The author biography refers to his completed Master’s research on Williams at the University of Amsterdam, sadly without quoting any title or titles which would facilitate searching online for a thesis or whatever. I suppose this substantial essay derives from that work, but if he has written at greater length and more detail, it would be splendid to read that, too, if at all possible!

    It is also worth mentioning that Thomas Willard has put his essay online.

    Like

Comment in the Co-Inherence

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s