Guest Post 1 on “The Place of the Lion” by Stephen Winter

The Place of the Lion

The Place of the Lion

This is the first in a series of guest posts written by readers of The Place of the Lion, one of CW’s great novels. I asked readers to read the novel and write a brief response for me to post. I received eight enthusiastic responses, of varying brevity. They vary from more formal, academic book reviews and pieces of literary criticism to personal, here’s-what-I-thought-of-it responses. I plan to post them in order from most accessible to most esoteric. Most of these posts assume the reader’s familiarity with The Place of the Lion, so you might want to read the novel first. You can find it here and here.

Today’s post is by Stephen Winter. Stephen WinterStephen is a chaplain who does freelance work in Spiritual Direction. He thinks of himself as “a kind of modern version of a mendicant friar of the Middle Ages travelling about with my begging bowl and receiving alms as I go from village to village, town to town.” Please visit his website, “Adventures in Living”.

My first thought on finishing The Place of the Lion was that I need to read it again! CW takes no prisoners in this book & he really expects the reader to follow up his clues to Abelard, Aquinas etc. While Damaris may have gone down a dangerous road in her studies, one that you referred to somewhere else as the road to hell, nevertheless it is through an understanding of the medieval scholars that an understanding of what is happening in the story takes place.

What I did understand gave me a sense of a description of spiritual journeys enfleshed vividly in CW’s own time and ours. I liked Anthony’s answer to Damaris’s question in the final chapter, “what is our necessity?” “It’s just to be, I suppose…the simpler one is the nearer one is to loving.” I think that only by giving himself up entirely to that simplicity can Anthony do what he does in the final chapter & not be destroyed by hubris. I really could not imagine myself in Anthony’s place there and yet I do believe as the early Fathers taught that our destiny is to be divine in perfect union with God. It is just that I do not see how I could be that here and now and not be overwhelmed by the most terrible spiritual pride. I am not sure that my wife could live with me either! 

The synthesis of the Bible and Plato is quite wonderful & it was new to me. It makes sense to read the story of Adam in terms of a Platonic archetype and takes us into much more wonderful places than the usual literalism. The mediaevals had access to riches & it seems to me that the strangeness of The Place of the Lion is as much to do with what we have lost since that time as anything else. I loved CW’s reading of the text that the Lion shall lie down with the Lamb and a Little Child (the Adamic archetype?) shall lead them. Of course I see Christ as the true Adam in which all of us are restored and what a beautiful dream of the healing of all Creation.

I do wish you every success in your work of making CW available in the 21st century. It would be wonderful if he became more widely read even though I suspect he will never be as popular as Lewis and Tolkien. What he does do is to deepen my understanding of those two writers. And what an encouraging line to all scholars when Anthony says to Damaris, “How can intelligence be wrong…and it’s a perfectly sound idea to make a beautiful thing of what you know.” How wonderful it would be if all scholars worked in that way!

Steven Winter

Advertisements

About Sørina Higgins

Sørina Higgins is a writer, English teacher, and Inklings scholar. Sørina serves as Chair of the Department of Language and Literature at Signum University and teaches English at King's College and Lehigh Carbon Community College. She has published two books of poetry, "The Significance of Swans" and "Caduceus."
This entry was posted in Guest Post and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Guest Post 1 on “The Place of the Lion” by Stephen Winter

  1. Hi Steven,
    I think what you say about the book taking us beyond the ‘usual literalism’ is spot on. The archetypal world CW conjures isn’t vague or diffuse in any way. It’s as real as the heaven in Lewis’s ‘The Great Divorce’, where you can “cut your finger on a blade of grass.” It’s portrayed, however, with a depth and imaginative range that takes us far beyond any kind of literalism/fundamentalism – religious, scientific, etc.
    Sounds like just what the 21st century needs 🙂
    All the best,
    John.

    Like

  2. Many thanks for your thoughts, John. I agree with your description of the archetypal world as being real, though not one to stray into unaware as do some of the characters in “The Place of the Lion”. We should only only explore there, “Under the Mercy”.

    Like

  3. Pingback: 1931: “The Place of the Lion” summary | The Oddest Inkling

Comment in the Co-Inherence

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s